Forgery & Fraud

The Biden autopen scandal continues to fester. A conservative organization that advocates for domestic energy production is raising serious concerns that Biden’s autopen was used to enact major policy changes because Biden never talked about them and was seemingly unaware of them.

For example, when Speaker Mike Johnson confronted Biden in the Oval Office about his ban on exporting liquified natural gas, Biden declared, “I didn’t do that!” When Johnson pressed him on the executive order that was signed a few weeks before, Biden again denied signing such an order.

It has long been established that signatures signed by an autopen for a president, a governor, or a member of Congress are legitimate and legally binding.

The issue with Biden’s autopen is whether someone signed the president’s name to a document under false pretenses or was unauthorized to do so. That’s forgery.

However, in Biden’s case, we also have the secondary concern of whether he was even able to give his consent to use the autopen.

We’re being told by numerous reporters and members of Congress that they knew he was failing quickly. But they thought they could get him reelected and would only need to show periodic “proof of life” during his second term while the White House staff ran the country behind the scenes.

Well, that’s essentially confessing to the fraud of Biden’s presidency and admitting that they would be (and likely already were) forging his signature without his knowledge.

If Biden didn’t know or wasn’t capable of “knowing” that his autopen signature was being used, it would be a forgery of an official U.S. document. That’s a federal crime. It’s also impersonating a federal official. That’s a federal crime.

Again, this is the biggest scandal in American history!